Having completed Bachelors and Masters degrees in engineering in the US, and now pursuing degree in philosophy in the UK, I think I’ve gained a perspective on the different pedagogical styles between the two places. I want to outline in detail how they vary for those interested…
First: the structure of classes. At Michigan, the Fall and Winter terms are ~14 weeks of instruction, and classes span one term. Oftentimes there are courses that are meant to be taken in succession, but they are always technically different courses, where you receive separate grades. In the UK, the Michaelmas and Lent term are each 10 weeks, and oftentimes courses span both 20 weeks— meaning that you receive one grade at the end of the year for the entirety of the work you’ve done. Still, there are 10-week courses (dubbed “half-unit” instead of “full-unit”), but they seem rare. Further differences arise in examinations. At Michigan, exams are always at the end of the 14-week term, usually with a few days off to allow for studying. When the term is over, exams have finished within a week or so, and students are free to go about their lives.
At LSE, the exam period in the summer is a range of 6 weeks that begins 4 weeks after the term ends. So although we have all of April off after Lent term ends, exams can be any time in May until mid-June. One benefit of this is never having exam’s on the same day, as would often happen at Michigan. Some courses have exams after Michaelmas (Fall) term, which occur in early January after the Christmas holidays, which seems to be a stressor during a time of supposed rest. Overall, at LSE there is less urgency, as the exams for a course that starts in September may not be until June, but I expect this to change in the coming weeks.
The next major difference is the grading. The philosophy courses I took at Michigan often had a few essays throughout the term, and sometimes problem sets or an exam at the end. Each of these is graded by the professor who teaches the course, and not under the presumption that the grading is anonymous. Essentially the professor has full autonomy over assigning grades to students, and there are many different pieces of work that are used in this assessment.
Courses in the UK are marked on fewer pieces of submitted, anonymously graded work. Every one of my courses has “formative” exams, which are entirely optional and do not contribute to the final mark. They are supposed to serve as an opportunity for students to see how their writing will be marked, and get feedback from their professors. Most of the grade is decided by one or two “summative” essays near the end of the course (or oftentimes due weeks after the term ends), which are graded anonymously by someone in the department (not necessarily the teacher of the course) and by faculty from different universities. Two different people are supposed to read and grade each essay— but this hasn’t happened on some occasions— as a way to ensure the grading is accurate; but, the second reader gets to see what grade was assigned by the first grader, so I find it difficult to believe this is as impartial as they claim. Additionally, students oftentimes meet with professors before writing their papers to share an essay outline, which would ruin the anonymity of a paper anyway. Overall, LSE’s grading is strange to me, since your entire mark for a yearlong course is decided on one exam or two essays. Perhaps this is reminiscent of old-school British education…
Grades take different numbers too. In the US it varies dramatically by the subject and the teacher, but it vaguely resembles 90-100 for an A, 80-90 for a B, 70-80 for a C, and so on. However, most STEM classes will have a curve as grades are oftentimes significantly lower than this. In the UK it’s 70+ for a Distinction, 60-70 for a Merit, 50-60 for a Pass. Grades in the 80s are essentially unheard of. Grades in the 90s are supposed to be on par with good papers in top peer-reviewed journals written by mature researchers.
Overall, I think the US system is a lot better pedagogically. Getting graded on more pieces of work seems to lead to overall more accurate marks (higher sample size → closer to the true average that you deserve), and the “anonymous” UK grading seems to not realize the benefits it touts. At times it seems lazy that there aren’t more assignments to do at LSE. Instead of constantly working and submitting things, they just ask you to turn in 1,2, or 3 flawless pieces of work at the end instead. But, the upside is that there is quite a bit of flexibility as a result. People can step away from their studies for a week or two, and not be hopelessly behind since they’ll have plenty of time to eventually catch up.